Skip to main content
The most important train signal is the forecast error, which is the difference between the observed value yτy_{\tau} and the prediction y^τ\hat{y}_{\tau}, at time yτy_{\tau}: eτ=yτy^ττ{t+1,,t+H}e_{\tau} = y_{\tau}-\hat{y}_{\tau} \qquad \qquad \tau \in \{t+1,\dots,t+H \} The train loss summarizes the forecast errors in different evaluation metrics.

1. Scale-dependent Errors

These metrics are on the same scale as the data.

Mean Absolute Error

mae

Mean Absolute Error Calculates Mean Absolute Error between y and y_hat. MAE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by calculating the deviation of the prediction and the true value at a given time and averages these devations over the length of the series. MAE(yτ,y^τ)=1Hτ=t+1t+Hyτy^τ\mathrm{MAE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} |y_{\tau} - \hat{y}_{\tau}| Parameters: Returns:

Mean Squared Error

mse

Mean Squared Error Calculates Mean Squared Error between y and y_hat. MSE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by calculating the squared deviation of the prediction and the true value at a given time, and averages these devations over the length of the series. MSE(yτ,y^τ)=1Hτ=t+1t+H(yτy^τ)2\mathrm{MSE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} (y_{\tau} - \hat{y}_{\tau})^{2} Parameters: Returns:

Root Mean Squared Error

rmse

Root Mean Squared Error Calculates Root Mean Squared Error between y and y_hat. RMSE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by calculating the squared deviation of the prediction and the observed value at a given time and averages these devations over the length of the series. Finally the RMSE will be in the same scale as the original time series so its comparison with other series is possible only if they share a common scale. RMSE has a direct connection to the L2 norm. RMSE(yτ,y^τ)=1Hτ=t+1t+H(yτy^τ)2\mathrm{RMSE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} (y_{\tau} - \hat{y}_{\tau})^{2}} Parameters: Returns:

2. Percentage errors

These metrics are unit-free, suitable for comparisons across series.

Mean Absolute Percentage Error

mape

Mean Absolute Percentage Error Calculates Mean Absolute Percentage Error between y and y_hat. MAPE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by calculating the percentual deviation of the prediction and the observed value at a given time and averages these devations over the length of the series. The closer to zero an observed value is, the higher penalty MAPE loss assigns to the corresponding error. MAPE(yτ,y^τ)=1Hτ=t+1t+Hyτy^τyτ\mathrm{MAPE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} \frac{|y_{\tau}-\hat{y}_{\tau}|}{|y_{\tau}|} Parameters: Returns:

SMAPE

smape

Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error Calculates Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error between y and y_hat. SMAPE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by calculating the relative deviation of the prediction and the observed value scaled by the sum of the absolute values for the prediction and observed value at a given time, then averages these devations over the length of the series. This allows the SMAPE to have bounds between 0% and 200% which is desirable compared to normal MAPE that may be undetermined when the target is zero. sMAPE2(yτ,y^τ)=1Hτ=t+1t+Hyτy^τyτ+y^τ\mathrm{sMAPE}_{2}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} \frac{|y_{\tau}-\hat{y}_{\tau}|}{|y_{\tau}|+|\hat{y}_{\tau}|} Parameters: Returns:

3. Scale-independent Errors

These metrics measure the relative improvements versus baselines.

Mean Absolute Scaled Error

mase

Mean Absolute Scaled Error Calculates the Mean Absolute Scaled Error between y and y_hat. MASE measures the relative prediction accuracy of a forecasting method by comparinng the mean absolute errors of the prediction and the observed value against the mean absolute errors of the seasonal naive model. The MASE partially composed the Overall Weighted Average (OWA), used in the M4 Competition. MASE(yτ,y^τ,y^τseason)=1Hτ=t+1t+Hyτy^τMAE(yτ,y^τseason)\mathrm{MASE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{season}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} \frac{|y_{\tau}-\hat{y}_{\tau}|}{\mathrm{MAE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{season}_{\tau})} Parameters: Returns:

Relative Mean Absolute Error

rmae

RMAE Calculates Relative Mean Absolute Error (RMAE) between two sets of forecasts (from two different forecasting methods). A number smaller than one implies that the forecast in the numerator is better than the forecast in the denominator. rMAE(yτ,y^τ,y^τbase)=1Hτ=t+1t+Hyτy^τMAE(yτ,y^τbase)\mathrm{rMAE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{base}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} \frac{|y_{\tau}-\hat{y}_{\tau}|}{\mathrm{MAE}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{base}_{\tau})} Parameters: Returns:

4. Probabilistic Errors

These measure absolute deviation non-symmetrically, that produce under/over estimation.

Quantile Loss

quantile_loss

Quantile Loss Computes the quantile loss between y and y_hat. QL measures the deviation of a quantile forecast. By weighting the absolute deviation in a non symmetric way, the loss pays more attention to under or over estimation. A common value for q is 0.5 for the deviation from the median (Pinball loss). QL(yτ,y^τ(q))=1Hτ=t+1t+H((1q)(y^τ(q)yτ)++q(yτy^τ(q))+)\mathrm{QL}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{(q)}_{\tau}) = \frac{1}{H} \sum^{t+H}_{\tau=t+1} \Big( (1-q)\,( \hat{y}^{(q)}_{\tau} - y_{\tau} )_{+} + q\,( y_{\tau} - \hat{y}^{(q)}_{\tau} )_{+} \Big) Parameters: Returns:

Multi-Quantile Loss

mqloss

Multi-Quantile loss Calculates the Multi-Quantile loss (MQL) between y and y_hat. MQL calculates the average multi-quantile Loss for a given set of quantiles, based on the absolute difference between predicted quantiles and observed values. MQL(yτ,[y^τ(q1),...,y^τ(qn)])=1nqiQL(yτ,y^τ(qi))\mathrm{MQL}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau},[\mathbf{\hat{y}}^{(q_{1})}_{\tau}, ... ,\hat{y}^{(q_{n})}_{\tau}]) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{q_{i}} \mathrm{QL}(\mathbf{y}_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{y}}^{(q_{i})}_{\tau}) The limit behavior of MQL allows to measure the accuracy of a full predictive distribution mathbfhatF_tau\\mathbf{\\hat{F}}\_{\\tau} with the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). This can be achieved through a numerical integration technique, that discretizes the quantiles and treats the CRPS integral with a left Riemann approximation, averaging over uniformly distanced quantiles. CRPS(yτ,F^τ)=01QL(yτ,y^τ(q))dq\mathrm{CRPS}(y_{\tau}, \mathbf{\hat{F}}_{\tau}) = \int^{1}_{0} \mathrm{QL}(y_{\tau}, \hat{y}^{(q)}_{\tau}) dq Parameters: Returns: James E. Matheson and Robert L. Winkler, “Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions”.

Examples and Validation